Are token buybacks really effective?
Only 2 projects are up since they kicked off their buyback programs:
@HyperliquidX | $HYPE: +152%
@aave | $AAVE: +94%
@SkyEcosystem | $SKY: -7%
@ethena_labs | $ENA: -10%
@ether_fi | $ETHFI: -34%
@pumpdotfun | $PUMP: -35%
@AerodromeFi | $AERO: -36%
@JupiterExchange | $JUP: -58%
@RaydiumProtocol | $RAY: -60%
What's your opinion, are they effective?
Only 2 tokens are up since their buyback programs started - $HYPE and $AAVE
$HYPE surged 152% since HL Assistance Fund started active buybacks. It's also one of the reasons HYPE held strong during the recent turbulence.
$AAVE is another solid example of successful buyback implementation, showing 94% growth since April.
Several tokens from this spotlight showed great performance at one point, driven by the impact of buybacks, but have fallen since. Most of them are still recovering from the Oct 11 market crash.
$PUMP +48% (at its highest since buybacks began)
$ENA +65%
$AERO +20%
$SKY +53%
Meanwhile, $JUP, $RAY, and $ETHFI keep falling despite ongoing buyback programs.
Btw, Jupiter announced it’s giving the token a fresh start, with more focused votings, a shorter unstaking period (30d → 7d), and a potential burn of ~121M $JUP, pending DAO approval.
Buybacks don’t work for every token. If the token’s value doesn’t match the project’s real goals, buybacks can turn into a money pit.
So if a project consistently generates revenue, there are probably better ways to reinvest that money. For example, into product growth, scaling, ecosystem expansion.
What's your opinion?

2.25万
21
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


