Incident Report: $PORT3 Hacker Attack PORT3 aimed to support the development of multiple chains, and therefore adopted @nexa_network’s cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 contained a boundary-condition validation vulnerability. After the token’s ownership was renounced, the function returned a value of 0, which happened to match the owner-verification condition. As a result, the ownership check failed and unauthorized access became possible. This issue was not identified in the CATERC20 audit report. Since the Port3 Token had previously renounced ownership for greater decentralization, it was in exactly this vulnerable state. 🧶 (1/3)
(2/3) The hacker discovered this authorization-verification bug in the PORT3 contract. At 20:56:24 PM UTC, using address 0xb13A503dA5f368E48577c87b5d5AeC73d08f812E, the hacker initiated a RegisterChains operation, registering his own address as an address authorized to perform BridgeIn operations. At the same time, the hacker deployed a fake token on the Arbitrum One chain and initiated a cross-chain transaction. Due to the flaw in the BSC-side Port3 token contract, the validation incorrectly passed, resulting in the minting of 1 billion tokens. The hacker then sold these tokens on DEXs, causing a rapid price crash.
(3/3) The attacker subsequently repeated the same exploit from other addresses, including: 0x7C2F4Bbda350D4423fBa6187dc49d84D125551fF We have contacted major exchanges to suspend deposits and withdrawals. Moving forward, we will fix the issue by reissuing the token with a new contract.
4.52万
98
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。