18 小时前
TL;DR: $1 is divided into 100 “CENTS” 1 BTC is divided into 100m “SATS” Simple. I can’t believe the amount of commas would hold anyone back. And if it did, renaming "sats" to "bitcoins" is not productive. Call them "bits" if you want it to sound more like "bitcoin".
19 小时前
BIP-177 is a subversive proposal imo. The goal? Change what we now call "sats" to "bitcoins". (using the "₿" character which is nice but irrelevant for the issue I see here) "sats" or "satoshi" has been used since early 2011 (but not officially documented). BIP-177 wants to change this established language that has been used in ALL of the Bitcoin education material made in the past decade. @BitcoinErrorLog wants to be "technically" right because there are no literal SUB-units we can call satoshis, they are referring to the BASE units. I find this strange because language matters and changing this is confusing to say the least. Why? 1 DOLLAR ≠ 100 dollars 1 USD ≠ 100 dollars It's: 1 DOLLAR = 100 CENTS 1 USD = 100 CENTS So this is logical: 1 bitcoin = 100,000,000 satoshi 1 BTC = 100,000,000 satoshi and this is not: 1 BTC = 100,000,000 bitcoins 0.345 BTC = ₿34,500,000 or 34,500,000 bitcoins That's what is proposed - are you following? ⬆ Changing what is basically UX copywriting that any app builder can decide for themselves will create confusion because people will now think there are 2.1 QUADRILLION BITCOINS (if this proposal goes through). Totally subversive to all existing educational material and it will confuse people because large numbers are incomprehensible and scary for many so where "21 million bitcoin" is still somewhat comprehensible for people, 2.1 QUADRILLION WILL NOT. Very bad idea. Prove me wrong. 🔗
8,574
27
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。